STORY BYYou were there—at the parties, family dinners, holiday get-togethers. You may even be there on Valentine’s Day. All those snuggle-cuddle, huggy times when we’re supposed to feel close to people.
Well, some of us do and some of us really, really don’t.
It doesn’t matter how many people are around or how many hugs are offered, some people just feel lonely. Maybe you are one of them. Why do your coworkers, even your siblings, gush about how “awesome” it was to be with everyone, to reconnect, feel that unity consciousness...when you felt, well...lonely?
In their book, Loneliness: Human Nature and the Need for Social Connection, Dr. John T. Cacioppo of the University of Chicago and co-author William Patrick of Harvard University Press look at the differences in people’s perceptions of loneliness and why loneliness is such an important problem. The first question they address is: Who gets lonely? The answer is obviously, “everyone, sometimes,” but it turns out that the powerful effects of loneliness stem from interplay of three complex factors:
However much connection with others we need, if we feel we’re not getting enough, we suffer. “Safety in numbers” and by extension, feeling connected, was necessary for our survival as a species. Since early humans were more likely to survive when they stuck together, evolution reinforced the preference for strong human bonds by selecting genes that support pleasure in company and produce feelings of unease when involuntarily alone. We feel both good and secure when we are connected, and bad and insecure when not connected. That’s why solitary confinement is considered such a severe punishment and tribes banish only the worst social miscreants.
So, if we come into the world with different needs for social connection, who are the natural social connectors? They are those people with warmth, openness, and an emotional generosity that draws others in. They are present with others, in sync with them, and open to what real connection might develop. Cacioppo and Patrick say, “The characteristic most common among those low in loneliness is a full availability to whatever genuine social interaction is appropriate to the moment...They are free to seek out and fully contribute to social situations and relationships.”
So, what if you aren’t the social type? What’s so bad about that? Nothing, if you’re talking about aloneness. Being alone and enjoying one’s own company is a strong sign of good, emotional health. The problem is that loneliness is a health risk. In his vast research with many colleagues, Cacioppo has found that “it was the subjective sense of loneliness—not a lack of objective social support—that uniquely predicted depressive symptoms, chronic health conditions, and elevated blood pressure.” It’s not how many people we’re around. It’s how connected we feel to them and others.
The research on loneliness suggests five possible pathways that it may negatively influence health:
OK, even if you are now somewhat convinced that being lonely is bad for your health, you don’t presto-chango become “a natural social connector with warmth, openness, and generosity that draws others in.” The spirit may be willing, but how are you even going to get started? Cacioppo and Patrick offer a plan. They call it: EASE your way to social connection
Withdrawal and passivity are associated with loneliness. They are motivated by the perception of being threatened. The world looks scary when you are lonely. Try a small, simple, social connection, like at the library or grocery store. Say, “Thank you for your help. I liked this book,” to the librarian. Ask the manager in the grocery store to help you find something. They are small social signals. Don’t take reactions personally if the librarian is grumpy or the manager rushed. Try again.
Plan how you’ll be around others. Volunteering is a good plan, starting with something that doesn’t demand a lot of social interaction, such as helping at an animal shelter or food bank. Don’t try to do too much at the beginning. Ask for a task that doesn’t require too much people contact at first, like stacking the shelves at the food bank. You’ll be around people and you’ll be appreciated.
Loneliness is not about the dearth of quantity of people in your life, but the quality of those relationships. Think about whom would likely be good companions for you based on what you like to do. (Think also about how good a companion you are to others, based on how you respond to them and their needs. Relationships by nature are reciprocal.)
Practice what you wish to present to the world. Imagine how you want to be and you’ll create meaningful connections.
If you haven’t watched A Christmas Carole in awhile, you might find it helpful. Scrooge, after his awakening, definitely (E) extended himself, (A) made an action plan (no time to waste), (S) selected carefully to whom he would atone and be generous, and (E) expected the best of himself. He succeeded very well, thank you, and so can you.
Dr. John T. Cacioppo is a professor at the University of Chicago and past president of the Association for Psychological Science. William Patrick is formerly the science editor at the Harvard University Press and founding editor of The Journal of Life Sciences.
Dr. Blair Justice is professor emeritus of psychology at UT School of Public Health and the author of several books. His wife, Dr. Rita Justice is a psychologist in private practice in Houston.
See Drs. Justice also at:
Eating healthy
reverses metabolic syndrome
Dr. Tasnime Akbaraly of University College London and her colleagues were interested if healthy eating could actually turn-the-tide and reverse metabolic syndrome, which is having 3 or more of the following risk factors: excess abdominal fat; high triglycerides, hypertension, low levels of HDL the “good” cholesterol, or type 2 diabetes. Having metabolic syndrome doubles a persons’ risk of heart disease and greatly increases the odds of developing type 2 diabetes.
The researchers studied 339 British civil servants with metabolic syndrome, and how closely the adhered to the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI) to see if it could help reverse metabolic syndrome. The AHEI is a set of published nutritional guidelines by the Harvard School of Public Health in 2002 that emphasizes whole grains, fruits, vegetables and decreased red meat consumption.
Five years into the study, nearly 50% no longer had metabolic syndrome. People who followed the AHEI guidelines the closest were nearly twice as likely to have reversed their metabolic syndrome. The results of the study were published in Diabetes Care, online July 29, 2010.
Dr. Alice Lichtenstein, an expert on diet and heart health from Tufts University in Boston who was not involved in the study said, "It's not about focusing on individual components of the diet, it's really the whole package, and that becomes important because it means that if one of the components of a healthy diet is to eat more fruits and vegetables, just buying a pill saying that there's a concentrated extract of fruits and vegetables is probably not what's going to help you."
Call and make an appointment with Wellness Coach Sam Hester, CWC, CPT, LWMC, at 713-500-3327. It's confidential and free. For more information on the wellness services provided, visit UT Counseling and WorkLife Services.